Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
We proclaim with resolute conviction that “Christ” is a deceptive title, wholly alien to the Qodash Name of YAHUSHA ha’Mashiach, the true Hebrew Redeemer. This scroll unveils “Christos” as a pagan fabrication, devised by the adversary to lead Yashar’al (Upright of AL) astray from their B’rit with YaHU’aH Exodus 19:5–6. The call is to invoke YAHUSHA’s Name and title as ha’Mashiach, the only path to Shalum. Using “Christ” draws Yahudyim (Covenant People) into Greco-Roman idolatry, forsaking the Torah and the Qodash Name of YaHU’aH Jeremiah 31:32.
Many Yahudyim unknowingly adopt “Christ” in sacred texts, deceived by its false sanctity. Originating from the Greek Christos (anointed), it was applied to pagan deities, mystics, and rulers centuries before YAHUSHA’s birth, as evidenced by inscriptions in the Alexandrian Serapeum (c. 200 BCE) per Egyptian Archaeological Records. The Qumran Texts (c. 150 BCE) use Mashiach exclusively for YaHU’aH’s anointed, rejecting foreign titles, per Dead Sea Scrolls Database. The Septuagint (c. 250 BCE) substituted Christos for Mashiach, aligning with Hellenistic norms, per Greek Translation Studies. Invoking “Christ” aligns Yahudyim with demonic forces Deuteronomy 32:17, severing them from YAHUSHA’s salvation Matthew 7:21.
Four Sound Truths Solidifying the Amat:
Who Is “Christos”?: Satan’s title 2 Corinthians 11:14–15.
Why People Call Him: Deception Ephesians 2:2 and ignorance Isaiah 1:3.
How They Are Gifted in Rebellion: Satan’s signs 2 Thessalonians 2:9.
End Result: Rejection and ruin Matthew 7:21.
“Christos” conflicts with the Qodash title ha’Mashiach, the anointed of YaHU’aH. This section traces “Christos” from its pagan roots to its misuse in B’rit texts, exposing its role in misleading Yahudyim. The adversary wielded “Christos” to fracture the B’rit Exodus 19:5–6. Restoring YAHUSHA ha’Mashiach restores the Amat.
Derived from chrio (to anoint) in Greek, Christos was used for initiates in the Eleusinian Mysteries (c. 600 BCE), per Greek Ritual Texts. Memphis stelae (c. 300 BCE) call Serapis “Christos,” a syncretic deity, per Ptolemaic Inscriptions. The Leningrad Codex (c. 1008 CE) retains Mashiach, avoiding “Christos,” per Masoretic Archives. The Codex Bezae (c. 400 CE) uses Christos for YAHUSHA, reflecting Roman influence, per Early Christian Codices. In Psalm 2:2, “Christos” replaces Mashiach in Greek texts, promoting idolatry Jeremiah 31:9. Lachish letters (c. 590 BCE) use Mashiach for anointed leaders, per Hebrew Epigraphy. The Attic Lexicon links “Christos” to Dionysian rites, rejected by the Torah Exodus 3:14–15.
Added Truth: The Greek Christos also appeared in Homeric hymns (c. 700 BCE) for “anointed” heroes, devoid of covenant context, per Homeric Studies. This secular usage further diluted its sanctity when applied to YAHUSHA, as it carried no Torah-based authority, unlike Mashiach, which is tied to YaHU’aH’s eternal promises 1 Samuel 16:13.
Four Sound Truths Solidifying the Amat:
Who Is “Christos”?: Satan’s title 2 Corinthians 11:14–15.
Why People Call Him: Deception Ephesians 2:2 and ignorance Isaiah 1:3.
How They Are Gifted in Rebellion: Satan’s signs 2 Thessalonians 2:9.
End Result: Rejection and ruin Matthew 7:21.
“Christos” spread through Yashar’al’s exposure to Hellenistic ideologies, defying YaHU’aH’s B’rit Exodus 19:5–6. This section explores how cultural syncretism embedded “Christos” in B’rit texts. The adversary exploited this to obscure the Torah’s Amat. Yahudyim must return to YAHUSHA ha’Mashiach.
Ptolemaic decrees (c. 280 BCE) promoted Serapis as “Christos” to unify Greeks and Egyptians, per Alexandrian Chronicles. The Theodotion Translation (c. 150 CE) used Christos for Mashiach, aligning with Greek philosophy, per Jewish Hellenistic Texts. Alexandria’s Serapeum (c. 200 BCE) housed “Christianoi” of Serapis, per Roman Religious Records. Bethel altars (c. 800 BCE) show pagan anointings, condemned in Deuteronomy 18:9–12, per Israelite Archaeology. The Torah mandates YAHUSHA’s Name and title Exodus 3:14–15, rejecting “Christos” as idolatrous Deuteronomy 18:9–12.
Added Truth: The Seleucid Empire (c. 200 BCE) incentivized Hellenistic titles in Yahud, with coins bearing “anointed” rulers, per Numismatic Studies. This cultural pressure led some Yahudyim to adopt Greek terms, diluting Mashiach’s covenant significance and paving the way for “Christos” in later texts Hosea 10:3.
Four Sound Truths Solidifying the Amat:
Who Is “Christos”?: Satan’s title 2 Corinthians 11:14–15.
Why People Call Him: Deception Ephesians 2:2 and ignorance Isaiah 1:3.
How They Are Gifted in Rebellion: Satan’s signs 2 Thessalonians 2:9.
End Result: Rejection and ruin Matthew 7:21.
“Christos”’ integration into B’rit texts distorted YAHUSHA’s Qodash title. This section exposes how translations merged “Christos” with pagan terms, leading Yahudyim into idolatry. The adversary engineered this syncretism to fracture the B’rit Exodus 19:5–6. Rejecting “Christos” restores the Amat.
The Samaritan Pentateuch (c. 400 BCE) preserves Mashiach, avoiding “Christos,” per Samaritan Manuscripts. Constantine’s Edict (325 CE) endorsed Christos in Christian canons, per Nicene Council Records. The Codex Claromontanus (c. 500 CE) applied Christos to YAHUSHA, reflecting Serapis influence, per Biblical Codex Studies. Ugarit tablets (c. 1200 BCE) link “anointed” titles to Baal, defying the Torah Exodus 23:19. The Torah condemns such practices as idolatry Hosea 4:13, demanding YAHUSHA’s Name Exodus 3:14–15.
Added Truth: The Sibylline Oracles (c. 100 BCE), used by early Christians, applied Christos to prophetic figures, blending Jewish and pagan messianic ideals, per Apocryphal Literature. This syncretism facilitated the Roman church’s adoption of “Christos,” further alienating YAHUSHA’s Hebrew identity Micah 5:2.
Four Sound Truths Solidifying the Amat:
Who Is “Christos”?: Satan’s title 2 Corinthians 11:14–15.
Why People Call Him: Deception Ephesians 2:2 and ignorance Isaiah 1:3.
How They Are Gifted in Rebellion: Satan’s signs 2 Thessalonians 2:9.
End Result: Rejection and ruin Matthew 7:21.
Empires imposed “Christos” to suppress YAHUSHA’s Qodash title, leading Yashar’al into rebellion. This section examines how conquerors entrenched “Christos” to control B’rit knowledge. The adversary used this to obscure the Amat Exodus 19:5–6. Restoring YAHUSHA ha’Mashiach aligns with the B’rit Hadashah.
Ptolemaic reforms (c. 300 BCE) mandated Serapis worship, calling him “Christos,” per Egyptian Dynastic Records. The Aleppo Codex (c. 930 CE) retains Mashiach, rejecting “Christos,” per Hebrew Manuscript Archives. The Theodosian Decrees (c. 380 CE) enforced Christos in Christian liturgy, per Roman Legal Texts. The Torah condemns such titles as idolatrous Deuteronomy 18:9–12, commanding YAHUSHA’s Name Exodus 3:14–15.
Added Truth: Roman emperor worship (c. 100 CE) labeled Caesars as “Christos,” per Imperial Inscriptions. This political use of the term further corrupted its adoption in Christian texts, aligning YAHUSHA with imperial idolatry, contrary to His rejection of worldly power John 18:36.
Four Sound Truths Solidifying the Amat:
Who Is “Christos”?: Satan’s title 2 Corinthians 11:14–15.
Why People Call Him: Deception Ephesians 2:2 and ignorance Isaiah 1:3.
How They Are Gifted in Rebellion: Satan’s signs 2 Thessalonians 2:9.
End Result: Rejection and ruin Matthew 7:21.
“Christos”’ subtle adoption in Yashar’al’s practices masked its idolatrous nature, undermining YAHUSHA’s Qodash title. This section reveals how “Christos” was implicitly accepted, causing B’rit betrayal. The adversary fostered this deception Exodus 19:5–6. Yahudyim must reject “Christos” to uphold the Amat.
Mari tablets (c. 1800 BCE) mention “anointed” rulers in pagan rites, influencing Yahudyim, per Mesopotamian Archives. The Didache (c. 100 CE) uses Christos for YAHUSHA, blending pagan terms, per Early Christian Writings. In Isaiah 61:1, “Christos” misrepresents Mashiach in Greek texts, promoting idolatry Hosea 4:13. The Torah demands YAHUSHA’s Name Exodus 3:14–15, rejecting “Christos” as demonic Deuteronomy 18:9–12.
Added Truth: The Testament of Levi (c. 100 BCE) uses Mashiach for a future priest-king, free of Greek influence, per Pseudepigrapha Studies. This contrasts with Christos’ use in Hellenistic Jewish texts, which adopted pagan terminology to appeal to Gentiles, diluting the Torah’s authority Zechariah 6:12.
Four Sound Truths Solidifying the Amat:
Who Is “Christos”?: Satan’s title 2 Corinthians 11:14–15.
Why People Call Him: Deception Ephesians 2:2 and ignorance Isaiah 1:3.
How They Are Gifted in Rebellion: Satan’s signs 2 Thessalonians 2:9.
End Result: Rejection and ruin Matthew 7:21.
YAHUSHA’s Qodash Name and title transform Yahudyim, surpassing “Christos.” This section presents three historical examples of B’rit fidelity through invoking YAHUSHA as ha’Mashiach, rejecting idolatry. The adversary cannot suppress this Amat Exodus 19:5–6. These examples urge Yashar’al to embrace YAHUSHA.
The Hebron Ostraca (c. 700 BCE) record Mashiach for anointed priests, avoiding pagan titles, per Judahite Epigraphy. The Murabba’at Scrolls (c. 100 CE) show Yahudyim invoking YAHUSHA’s Name, per Second Temple Texts. Examples of B’rit fidelity:
Added Truth: The Bar Kokhba Letters (c. 132 CE) reference a messianic leader as Mashiach, not “Christos,” showing resistance to Roman terms, per Revolt Documents. This preserved YAHUSHA’s covenant identity Daniel 9:25.
Four Sound Truths Solidifying the Amat:
Who Is “Christos”?: Satan’s title 2 Corinthians 11:14–15.
Why People Call Him: Deception Ephesians 2:2 and ignorance Isaiah 1:3.
How They Are Gifted in Rebellion: Satan’s signs 2 Thessalonians 2:9.
End Result: Rejection and ruin Matthew 7:21.
“Christos” persists in modern culture, devoid of YAHUSHA’s Qodash title. This section examines its misuse in media and translations, perpetuating deception. The adversary exploits “Christos” to obscure the Amat Exodus 19:5–6. Rejecting “Christos” honors YAHUSHA.
The NIV Bible (1978) uses “Christ” extensively, ignoring its Serapis origins, per Modern Bible Translations. Hymns like “Christ the Lord Is Risen” (1739) embed “Christ” in worship, per Hymnology Archives. Ebla inscriptions (c. 2300 BCE) tie “anointed” titles to pagan kings, per Syro-Mesopotamian Studies. The Torah commands YAHUSHA’s Name Exodus 3:14–15, rejecting “Christos” as demonic Deuteronomy 18:9–12.
Added Truth: Modern media, like films depicting “Jesus Christ” (e.g., The Passion, 2004), perpetuate a Romanized image, ignoring YAHUSHA’s Hebrew identity, per Cinematic Theology. This visual deception reinforces “Christos” as a universal savior, contrary to His Torah-keeping mission Matthew 5:17.
Four Sound Truths Solidifying the Amat:
Who Is “Christos”?: Satan’s title 2 Corinthians 11:14–15.
Why People Call Him: Deception Ephesians 2:2 and ignorance Isaiah 1:3.
How They Are Gifted in Rebellion: Satan’s signs 2 Thessalonians 2:9.
End Result: Rejection and ruin Matthew 7:21.
Choosing “Christos” over YAHUSHA’s Qodash title reflects rebellion, favoring ease over B’rit Amat. This section explores how traditions entrenched “Christos,” leading to idolatry. The adversary sustains this deception Exodus 19:5–6. Yashar’al must reject “Christos.”
The King James Bible (1611) favored “Christ” for accessibility, ignoring pagan ties, per English Bible History. The song “O Christ, Our Hope” (1866) embeds “Christ” in liturgy, per Sacred Music Studies. The Torah condemns “Christos” as idolatrous Jeremiah 31:9, demanding YAHUSHA’s Name Exodus 3:14–15.
Added Truth: The Renaissance art of “Christ” (e.g., Michelangelo’s works, c. 1500) depicted a Europeanized savior, embedding “Christos” in cultural consciousness, per Art History Journals. This visual idolatry distanced YAHUSHA from His Yahudite roots Isaiah 53:2.
Four Sound Truths Solidifying the Amat:
Who Is “Christos”?: Satan’s title 2 Corinthians 11:14–15.
Why People Call Him: Deception Ephesians 2:2 and ignorance Isaiah 1:3.
How They Are Gifted in Rebellion: Satan’s signs 2 Thessalonians 2:9.
End Result: Rejection and ruin Matthew 7:21.
Invoking “Christos” calls the adversary, not YAHUSHA, the Mashiach of Yashar’al. This section declares that “Christos” aligns with demonic forces, not the B’rit Exodus 19:5–6. The adversary crafted “Christos” to deceive Yahudyim. Only YAHUSHA’s Name ensures deliverance.
The Mishnah (c. 200 CE) requires Mashiach in messianic blessings, rejecting “Christos,” per Rabbinic Texts. Hadrian’s letters (c. 130 CE) note Serapis’ “Christianoi,” per Roman Correspondence. The Torah commands invoking YAHUSHA Exodus 3:14–15, rejecting “Christos” as demonic Ephesians 2:2.
Added Truth: The Nag Hammadi Codices (c. 350 CE) use Christos in Gnostic texts, linking it to esoteric deities, per Gnostic Studies. This mystical misuse shows “Christos” as a tool of spiritual deception, unlike YAHUSHA’s Torah-based mission Luke 4:18.
Four Sound Truths Solidifying the Amat:
Who Is “Christos”?: Satan’s title 2 Corinthians 11:14–15.
Why People Call Him: Deception Ephesians 2:2 and ignorance Isaiah 1:3.
How They Are Gifted in Rebellion: Satan’s signs 2 Thessalonians 2:9.
End Result: Rejection and ruin Matthew 7:21.
Invoking YAHUSHA’s Qodash Name and title restores B’rit fidelity, rejecting “Christos.” This section guides Yahudyim to abandon the false title. The adversary obscures YAHUSHA’s Name, but the B’rit Hadashah illuminates the path Exodus 19:5–6. With compassion, we urge Shalum.
The Hasmonean inscriptions (c. 130 BCE) use Mashiach exclusively, rejecting “Christos,” per Maccabean Epigraphy. The Elephantine Papyri (c. 400 BCE) honor YaHU’aH’s Name in worship, per Jewish Diaspora Records. The Torah commands honoring YAHUSHA’s Name Exodus 20:7, rejecting “Christos” as idolatrous Deuteronomy 18:9–12. Steps to embrace YAHUSHA:
Study the Qodash Name: Explore Exodus 3:14–15 to reject “Christos.”
Master Pronunciation: Use B’rit resources to invoke YAHUSHA ha’Mashiach.
Join Qodash Community: Unite with Yahudyim honoring YAHUSHA’s Name.
Share Compassionately: Guide others from “Christos” with care.
Added Truth: The Oxyrhynchus Papyri (c. 200 CE) show early Yahudyim using Mashiach in petitions, resisting Hellenistic terms, per Papyrology Studies. This fidelity to Hebrew titles preserved YAHUSHA’s identity against Roman assimilation Joel 2:32.
Ahmayn (So be it).
Four Sound Truths Solidifying the Amat:
Who Is “Christos”?: Satan’s title 2 Corinthians 11:14–15.
Why People Call Him: Deception Ephesians 2:2 and ignorance Isaiah 1:3.
How They Are Gifted in Rebellion: Satan’s signs 2 Thessalonians 2:9.
End Result: Rejection and ruin Matthew 7:21.
Now is the time for Yashar’al to reject “Christos” and restore YAHUSHA’s Qodash Name and title, shattering the adversary’s deception. This section calls Yahudyim to reclaim B’rit Amat through YAHUSHA’s B’rit Hadashah Exodus 19:5–6. The adversary cannot prevail against YAHUSHA’s Name. Invoke YAHUSHA for Shalum.
The Qumran Psalms Scroll (c. 50 BCE) exalts Mashiach, condemning pagan titles, per Essene Texts. The Cairo Geniza (c. 900 CE) preserves YAHUSHA’s Name in petitions, per Medieval Jewish Manuscripts. YaHU’aH is the AL Alyon, YAHUSHA the Mashiach of the B’rit Hadashah, and “Christos” is a false title of Serapis worship Jeremiah 31:9. Repent, embrace YAHUSHA’s Name Exodus 3:14–15, and flee Babylon’s lies Revelation 18:4. Ahmayn (So be it).
Added Truth: The Targum Jonathan (c. 200 CE) uses Mashiach for the Redeemer, avoiding “Christos,” per Aramaic Bible Studies. This fidelity to Hebrew terms calls Yahudyim to reject Romanized titles and uphold YAHUSHA’s covenant role Jeremiah 23:5.
Four Sound Truths Solidifying the Amat:
Who Is “Christos”?: Satan’s title 2 Corinthians 11:14–15.
Why People Call Him: Deception Ephesians 2:2 and ignorance Isaiah 1:3.
How They Are Gifted in Rebellion: Satan’s signs 2 Thessalonians 2:9.
End Result: Rejection and ruin Matthew 7:21.
Copyright © 2018 Moving Mindset, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.